Deghebh wrote:
Domhnaillín Breac wrote:
Deghebh wrote:
What I was complaining about was the method of perpetrating propaganda by quietly setting objectionable truths aside, and renewing the attack from a different angle.
I didn't "quietly set objectionable truths aside". You hadn't presented any--and still haven't. Reply to the factual points of my counterargument, if you can. If not,
bí id' thost.
I was not ever, anywhere presenting 'truths'.
So what you are saying now is that you deliberately misrepresented the situation when you accused others of "quietly setting objectionable truths aside".
But that doesn't matter now. I'm just glad to have you admit that you have no facts to back up your arguments. Therefore, there is nothing for me to refute and I can return to my real purpose here: cur feabhais ar mo chuid Gaelainne.
Deghebh wrote:
It i NOT for me to prove that the coincidences are more than coincidences.
It is for YOU to PROVE that coincidences is all they are.
That is, I provide a hypothesis, and you destroy it.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to PROVE a hypothesis other than by failing to destroy it, indeed, that is what 'prove' means.
This is exactly the sort of absurdity I was trying to circumvent by asking that we refrain from engaging in
basic logical fallacies.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
