kokoshneta wrote:
Should there perhaps be a level for ‘natives’? Not that they aren’t learners, too; but having it be an actual level (manually and individually assigned by an admin, of course) would help to quickly distinguish the native speakers from the rest of us … if that’s really necessary, I mean.
It was contemplated, kk, but the definition of "native" itself can be controversial - and as you know some near-natives can be as strong as natives in certain areas. In the end, it was a native who suggested that even natives can learn from non-natives and vice versa.
It would be appreciated if people would give honest notification of their abilities in their signatures, etc., but in any case, it soon becomes clear enough which people have strengths and weaknesses in which areas without explicitly labelling them.
We want to encourage everyone to a spirit of mutual learning that makes use of their strengths but also helps them address their weaknesses and supplement them with knowledge gained from others on the forum.
So we have decided not to impose labels on people and will stick to one term that defines our overall purpose.
Breandán
(Crossed with Redwolf's explanantion but complementary rather than contradictive thereof.

)