Breandán wrote:
Firstly, on the subject of "being rude". I don't think it is unreasonable to expect new arrivals to take the time to introduce themselves and otherwise make a positive contribution to the forum before proceeding to jump into a heated debate. Otherwise it gives the appearance (at least) of only having joined the forum to push an agenda or cause trouble.
Fine, fine, but a little over-sensitive and aggressive if you ask me. Anyway, that's between you and the poster concerned.
Breandán wrote:
My point, inexpertly presented, was that both terms have long histories of positive (and negative) use, and some Irish people _do_ still use "Gaelic" to refer to the Irish language in a favorable fashion, as an Lon Dubh said in his own post.
Well, that might have been your intention, but it was not at all the point you actually made. What you say here seems more coherent and reasonable.
Breandán wrote:
Even if there are others who abuse the word "Gaelic", I don't think that should be reason to avoid the term. Those same people would abuse the term "Irish" if it were the only term available.
Of course. And anyway, it's a beautiful word – I see no reason for avoiding it.
Breandán wrote:
People who use the term "Gaelic" or "Irish Gaelic" definitely shouldn't be jumped on for doing so, but can you not see that that is exactly what you are doing?
Are you talking to me here, or have my ideas merged with those of other posters in your mind? I haven't “jumped on” anybody – the opposite in fact.
Breandán wrote:
Perhaps it was a stretch to assert that "Gaelic" was more prevalent, but it was in use and the official "choice" of the term "Irish" has had the (most likely unintentional) effect of polarising opinions.
Firstly, you 'stretch' your arguments because you want to create a justification for personally using the word 'Gaelic'. Apparently you need to convince yourself that 'Irish' is a politically-peddled neologism in order to do that. But, Breandán, there's no need to justify yourself. Anyone with a gram of sense can see that 'Gaelic' is as much the name of the language as anything else.
Secondly, opinions aren't polarised in Ireland – only on this forum apparently. In Ireland, most people use the term 'Irish' to describe the language when speaking in English (within and without the Gaeltacht) but only a fool will correct someone who says 'Gaelic'. There are fools everywhere. I think the point I made was that this was a simply a matter of people's habits, within and without Ireland, and the situations you describe seem to be part of the usual tensions between Irish people living in Ireland and those of the diaspora. On this matter, those tensions are largely the result of ignorance.
What I objected to was the repetition here that the term “Irish” has been imposed by officialdom since the formation of the state, with the implication that those of you that use the term 'Gaelic' are somehow warriors keeping the language real. This is what you claimed in your previous post, and this is what I corrected. You seem to have changed your mind somewhat in the meantime.
Breandán wrote:
I think it is telling that the examples of positive use of the term "Gaelic" (alongside the use of "Irish") have come from older Gaeltacht speakers. Those most emphatic about using only the term "Irish" tend to be (but are not limited to) second-language speakers.
You keep doing this. You cannot make such a big statement based on a couple of anecdotes. It's absurd, and you know it is. I've already suggested that you read up on it a little rather than just make claims that suit whatever preconceived notions you have. Yes, some Gaeltacht speakers have used, and surely still do, the term 'Gaelic'. Others, including very prominent writers from all the Gaeltachtaí, used “Irish” when writing in English. A lot of native speakers have used both. You say that those emphatic about using 'Irish' tend to be second-language speakers. I would suggest that people that are emphatic or obsessive about
either term tend to be second-language speakers. Whatever they are, it's a waste of time!
Breandán wrote:
I am not saying that the result was intentional but one of the effects of standardisation has been that non-native speakers will often try to "correct" native speakers and others who have not come through the same system. We get told our dialects are "incorrect" Irish.
This has nothing to do with my original comments. Whilst someone can be ignorant on two issues simultaneously (i.e. insisting on the 'correct' name of the language, or 'correcting' native Gaeltacht speech) that doesn't give you the right to conflate those same issues in order to suit preconceptions of your own.
When I referred to your 'paranoia' I was talking about the idea that the use of the word 'Irish' to describe the language was thrust upon the world by officaldom, or governments, or politicians. That is not true and you have not shown it to be the case. The word has been used for centuries, by non-native and native speakers alike. I've never said that it's more correct than anything else, just that it happens to be the word most in use in the Ireland of today (in English obviously), within or without the Gaeltacht.
I can understand how Irish people (or anyone else) correcting your use of the word 'Gaelic' could be infuriating, but rewriting history is no way to vent your frustrations.
Slán,
Domhnall